CHBC One is in development. Explore the industrial EAM preview. View roadmap →
INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISE ASSET MANAGEMENT
Customer Account CHBC One Login
CHBC one
University/Safety & quality

CHBC UNIVERSITY / FIELD GUIDE

Inspection and audit: complementary views

Understand the difference between checking workplace conditions and evaluating a management system.

Engineer holding documents beside industrial machinery
Illustrative stock photography · Sergey Sergeev / Pexels

UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT

A workplace inspection examines conditions and activities within a defined area or scope. An audit evaluates evidence against defined criteria, often asking whether a management process is designed and operating as intended. Both can reveal important gaps, but their conclusions answer different questions. A tidy workshop does not establish that the maintenance management system is effective across an entire business.

Keep the scope, date, criteria, evidence, and reviewer attached to each result. Inspection findings may reveal a local concern; repeated findings may become evidence for a broader audit. An audit can also show that inspections are missing certain shifts or that actions are closed without verification. Avoid combining completion counts into a single success measure. Review whether the activities produced useful findings and whether accountable people addressed them through the site's approved processes.

Questions to take back to your team

  1. What conditions or management criteria are being examined?
  2. Does the sample include relevant areas and shifts?
  3. Can each finding be traced to evidence and an accountable owner?

Awareness guide only. Follow applicable requirements, qualified review and your site’s approved procedures. Reading this page does not authorize work or certify competence.

Further reading

Explore the primary references below. Requirements and applicability depend on your organization and jurisdiction.